COURT RULES “PADDLING” NOT ABUSE 06/03/2008


by Moody Adams
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled Friday that a father who spanked his 12-year-old son 36 times with a maple paddle did not commit physical abuse” reported WorldNetDaily.com. “The unanimous ruling reversed the county and district courts. The ruling ended thrparent’s three year nightmare.

An attorney appointed to represent the children's interests, argued that while there was no evidence of injury, inflicting pain should be grounds enough for establishing abuse. The supreme Court disagreed.

"We are unwilling to establish a bright-line rule that the infliction of any pain constitutes either physical injury or physical abuse, because to do so would effectively prohibit all corporal punishment of children by their parents," Justice Alan Page wrote for the court.

The law allows "reasonable discipline," the ruling said, and "it is clear to us that the Legislature did not intend to ban corporal punishment."

For details go to http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=65997



comments powered by Disqus